Senate passes housing bill with single-family rental forced sale provision | Dump Trucks Charlotte NC

First published on

The Senate on Thursday passed a major housing bill 89-10 that aims to bolster the housing supply and improve affordability. However, multifamily groups are sounding the alarm over a provision that they say would effectively eliminate the production of build-to-rent single-family housing and ultimately increase rent and home prices.

The bipartisan 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which would be the largest housing package signed into law in about 30 years, contains a number of measures designed to increase the supply of homes in order to advance its goal of improving affordability. While it is broadly supported by the housing industry, advocates warn the recently added Section 901 would have a chilling effect on the sector.

That section restricts institutional investors, defined as those that directly or indirectly own at least 350 single-family homes, from purchasing more SFHs. It exempts large investors that significantly overhaul or build new single-family homes specifically for the rental market — but critically, it still requires these properties to be sold to an individual homeowner after seven years. The renter would have first dibs to purchase. 

Investors of this size own about 0.7% of the country’s 92 million single-family homes, and they have been scaling back acquisitions in recent years, making 1% of all U.S. home purchases, down from a 4% peak in 2022, according to analysis from John Burns Research and Consulting.

“Because BTR developments require large-scale investment and benefit from economies of scale, most firms operate beyond that threshold. They cannot invest under the risk of forced sales and potential losses driven by arbitrary deadlines,” per a March 5 letter from dozens of housing groups. The cosigners want to build-to-rent homes to be fully exempt.

The measure is billed as a way to “promote homeownership opportunities for American families, not corporations,” echoing President Donald Trump’s recent push to restrict institutional investors from buying up single-family homes. A Feb. 9 statement indicated that he wouldn’t sign the housing package without a single-family investor ban. However, Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order to that end had a clearer carveout for build-to-rent housing.

The new seven-year disposition requirement would be damaging to the legislation’s stated goals, according to Greg Brown, senior vice president of government affairs at the National Apartment Association.

“In practice, the disposition provision would stifle any meaningful investment into build-to-rent, ultimately removing a flexible and affordable living option for many Americans and their families, lowering rental supply and upending an important part of our nation’s housing affordability solution,” Brown told Multifamily Dive in an email.

BTR ban complications

Build-to-rent single-family homes are underwritten, financed and constructed as multifamily housing, according to a March 10 open letter from housing industry groups, and it is not possible to sell individual units as single-family homes as the provision requires. Plus, selling off BTR homes would require paying off the entire loan at the same time.

The provision brings up a slew of practical challenges, according to National Multifamily Housing Council President Sharon Wilson Géno, and “honestly, we don't think it's constitutional. It's not even legal.”

“I don't even know how you would do it, because many of these properties are built on large parcels, you know, one, two, maybe three contiguous parcels. They're not even platted for sale. So to go back in, it's like putting a square peg in a round hole. The utilities are structured for rental,” Wilson Géno told Multifamily Dive.

There's a tremendous misunderstanding about what institutional investment in multifamily is or does, according to Wilson Géno.